To read the abstract, please click on the title of the publication
of interest. If you want to access the publication on PubMed,
please click on the PubMed ID.
To find specific publications, please use the sort and search functions. Please enter one word only as search term.
|72||Lack of agreement and trending ability of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor compared with thermodilution.|
Moller-Sorensen H; Hansen KL; Ostergaard M; Andersen LW; Moller K
Acta Anaesthesiol Scand 2011; 56(4): 433-440
PubMed ID: 22191436
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive monitoring systems of central haemodynamics are gaining increasing popularity. The present study investigated the precision of the endotracheal cardiac output monitor (ECOM) system and its agreement with pulmonary artery catheter thermodilution (PAC TD) for measuring cardiac output (CO) during steady state and with induced haemodynamic changes in patients scheduled for elective cardiac surgery. METHODS: Twenty-five patients were enrolled. After induction of anaesthesia, endotracheal intubation using a dedicated ECOM tube, and insertion of the pulmonary artery catheter (PAC), the patient was placed in the following successive positions: (a) supine, (b) head-down tilt, (c) head-up tilt, (d) supine, (e) supine with phenylephrine administration. CO was measured simultaneously using the ECOM and the PAC. RESULTS: Both methods showed an equally good precision < 10%. Compared to PAC TD, the ECOM system was associated with a bias in supine position of -0.45 l/min (95% confidence interval: -0.86; -0.05), limits of agreement -2.40 l/min to 1.49 l/min and a percentage error of 41.0%. There was no agreement in trending ability between the two methods, with a concordance rate of 30%, shown in a four-quadrant plot. CONCLUSION: In a direct comparison with PAC TD, the ECOM system did not show an acceptable agreement, with wide limits of agreement, a much larger percentage error than should be expected from the precision of the two methods and a very poor trending ability. Thus, the ECOM does not replace measurements done by thermodilution using a pulmonary artery catheter in cardiac surgery patients. (c) 2011 The Authors Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica (c) 2011 The Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica Foundation.